Supreme Court Mandates Courtroom Experience for Judicial Appointments
National: The Supreme Court has ruled that fresh law graduates will no longer be eligible to sit for judicial services examinations, making at least three years of courtroom experience a mandatory prerequisite. This decision, delivered by a bench led by Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih, marks a significant shift in the appointment process for lower judiciary positions.
Chief Justice Gavai emphasized that practical experience in court is essential for ensuring judicial efficiency and competence. He noted that hands-on legal practice equips candidates with the skills needed for handling judicial responsibilities. This ruling underscores the importance of real-world experience in the legal profession.
The verdict came in response to a plea by the All India Judges Association, which had raised concerns over the competence of fresh graduates appointed to lower judicial posts. Reports from several high courts highlighted recurring challenges faced by newly inducted judges with no courtroom exposure.
The Supreme Court observed that the appointment of fresh law graduates has led to several difficulties, as noted by multiple high courts. This ruling aims to address these challenges and ensure that only candidates with adequate courtroom experience are appointed to judicial positions.
The ruling applies to entry-level posts for civil judges in the lower judiciary, reinforcing the view that real-world legal experience is crucial for judicial integrity and performance. This decision is expected to have a significant impact on the appointment process for judicial positions in the country.
Read More: Assam Water Resources Department Cracks Down on Job Appointment Hoax